Saturday, January 24, 2009

'No God' advertisements banned in Italy-A difference of perspectives

THE FOLLOWING ADVERTISEMENT IN THE CITY BUSES OF ITALY HAS BEEN BANNED.


Can you guess why??If not, scroll down to read the story.


It is a 'No God' advertisement launched by the Atheists (people who don't beleive in God) in Italy.In the photograph, the Atheist bus campaign creator Ariane Sherine poses in front of a bus. The advertisement reading"The bad news is that God doesn't exist but the good news is that you don't need him."were to be put in the northern cities of Genoa, where the catholic cardinal, head of the Italian Bishop's conference resides. On the contrary the Atheists have been running these advertisements in the city buses of Barcelona,Washington and London.For more information click on this link.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/4823257a34.html

According to Giorgio Villella of The Italian Union of Atheists and Rationalist Agnostics (UAAR).
"Right-wing politicians criticized us ferociously, It's strange that in a country where ads depicting near-naked women wearing skimpy lingerie is permitted on buses that we can't run ads about atheism,"

Some other views of people from all over the world,

'The Italian government really has no concept of freedom of speech. It's a shame, really.'

'Keep on fighting, Italian free-thinkers, we support you!'

For viewing more reactions go to the following link.

http://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/7qhro/no_god_bus_ads_banned_in_italian_city/

Moreover, in the context of the 'No God' advertisement, the Atheists have raised a very valid question.If a country can allow advertisements with ladies wearing skimpy clothes then what is the harm in having their ads being put on the city buses.I agree with them on this point. If everyone has the freedom of expression then the Atheists also have the right to voice their opinion.Banning the advertisement was Italy's perspective which brings me to the concepts learned in the communication class.

A perspective is a coherent set of assumptions about the way a process operates-(Thinking Through Communication,SarahTrenholm).There are four perspectives of communication.They are; Psychological, Social constructionist, Pragamatic and Cultural Studies.

Psychological perspective deals with the individual aspect where as Social Constructive deals with the people in the world as a whole.In Pragmatic perspective, the communication is considered as a game in which the individuals make individual moves or acts.In Cultural studies the relationship between communication and power is studied.Each perspective has its pros and cons.

Banning the above advertisement falls under the Cultural Studies perspective where the atheists use the advertisemt to promote atheism in a large scale .Theses days there is a growth in the number of people moving away from organized religions to being spiritual or atheists.Hence Italy must have banned the advertisements as it would have a negative impact on the people which is quite acceptable from their perspective.Here is a look at the top 50 countries with the highest percentage of athesists in the year 2005 .
http://www.adherents.com/largecom/com_atheist.html

After understanding the different perspectives and Italy's concern of the growth in the number of atheists, I still think Italy should not have banned the advertisement. Now the question arises; Did Italy take the right step in banning this advertisement?

Sunday, January 18, 2009

'We are what we repeatedly do'

This is my first blog entry and I am quite excited as well as nervous about it. As we begin an essay with a proverb, I am writing my first entry on a quote.
'We are what we repeatedly do'.This is one of Aristotle's famous quotations.I came across it when my Communication Teacher was briefing us about the definition and the history of communication.


In the class there was a discussion or rather an argument whether it is true or not.Some agreed and some didn't.I fell into the former category.If we analyze the quote then I think what we do in our daily lives is the real us.What we are is reflected in our behavior and mannerisms.For example;if a person constantly bites his nails ,it shows that he is nervous or anxious.Another example would be, people who constantly look in the mirror shows that they are very particular about their looks.

Those who didn't agree with the quote did put forward some valid points.Some said that people have unique traits in them and it is not necessary that what they repeatedly do reflects in their behavior.It might be due to compulsion.For example;people who cook doesn't mean that they enjoy cooking.They might be doing it as they have no other choice.

The debate can go on but this quote left a lasting impression on my mind.